Position Size vs Kelly Criterion
Both Position Sizing and Kelly Criterion aim to manage risk — but they solve different problems. One prioritizes stability. The other maximizes long-term growth. Choosing the wrong one can dramatically increase drawdowns.
Kelly only works if you can estimate your edge (win rate and payoff) from real trade data.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Position Size | Kelly Criterion |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | Control risk per trade | Maximize long-term growth |
| Risk Level | Low to moderate | High (unless fractional) |
| Drawdowns | More controllable | Can be severe |
| Requires edge estimate? | No | Yes (win rate + payoff) |
| Best for | Most traders | Advanced / quant traders |
| Beginner friendly | Yes | No |
When to Use Position Sizing
Position sizing works by risking a fixed percentage of your account on each trade — typically 1–2%. This approach prioritizes capital preservation over aggressive growth.
- •Fixed risk per trade (e.g., 1% of account)
- •You want a simple rule you can follow every trade
- •Accounts where capital preservation matters most
- •Traders who want predictable, consistent risk
When to Use Kelly Criterion
Kelly Criterion calculates the optimal bet size to maximize long-term compound growth. It requires knowing your win rate and average win/loss ratio — and can suggest aggressive position sizes.
- •You have a proven, measurable edge
- •Large sample size of trades (100+)
- •Comfortable with higher volatility and drawdowns
- •Often used at fractional Kelly (25-50%)
Which Should You Use?
If you are unsure of your edge or your edge isn't measured, Position Sizing is the safer default. It keeps risk predictable and protects your capital during losing streaks.
Kelly Criterion should only be used when your edge is proven over a large sample — and usually at a fraction of full Kelly (25–50%) to reduce volatility. If your edge estimate is wrong, Kelly will oversize you.
Many professional traders use position sizing for most trades and only apply Kelly-style sizing for high-conviction setups with proven edges. Consider using the Risk of Ruin Calculator to understand your probability of significant drawdown with either approach.
Related comparisons
Per-trade risk control vs long-run blow-up probability.
Why price moves vs what you make/lose at expiration.
Market expectations vs past price movement — when to use implied volatility or historical volatility for trading decisions.
Related Strategy Guides
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Kelly Criterion better than position sizing?
Not necessarily. Kelly maximizes long-term growth but increases drawdowns significantly. Most traders use fixed position sizing or fractional Kelly for more stable results.
Can beginners use Kelly Criterion?
Generally no. Kelly requires accurate estimates of win rate and average payoff, which most beginners don't have. Start with fixed position sizing until you have enough trade data.
What is fractional Kelly?
Using a portion (e.g., 25% or 50%) of the full Kelly recommendation to reduce volatility and drawdowns while still capturing most of the long-term growth benefits.
Do professional traders use Kelly?
Some do — almost always fractional Kelly (25–50%) with strict risk controls. Many hedge funds use Kelly-inspired sizing for systematic strategies where edge is quantifiable.
How do I know if I have an edge?
Track at least 100+ trades with consistent rules. Calculate your win rate and average win/loss ratio. If your expected value per trade is positive over a meaningful sample, you may have an edge.